
Position: 100 mi. west of Littlerock
Altitude: 34,000 feet
Groundspeed: 483 mph (420 kts)
Equipment: A320
Pax-on-Board: 150
Destination: KLAS (Las Vegas)
Airborne...
What a trip! It is day three of four, most of it a blur of miles on the jet airways. We have been hubbing out of KATL (Atlanta), the busiest airport in the world, for two days. Finally, today, we broke free like Captain Kirk from a Klingon tractor beam and are heading for Lost Wages with 150 folks.
This captain's stress levels have re-entered the green arc and are slowly falling. That grin of a Cheshire cat underneath the bird cage is back.
We are in the sweet spot of aviation weather for the year; the first three weeks of October. The sky is relaxing from the summer turmoil, taking a breather before the polar air masses begin their southern migration. Ahead of us, as far as these middle-aged eyes can see, nothing but cold blue.
Atlanta ATC asked us if we could depart on a different runway than advertised on the automated information, which we agreed to immediately. Airborne in seven minutes from engine start, instead of the forecast 44 minute taxi time was a wonderful thing, except for the excess fuel we are now carrying.
Excess fuel? What is that? Never heard of it...
Our flight is landing weight limited on this leg. That means that we will be at landing weight on final approach at KLAS; anymore fuel, even a small amount, will make us too heavy to land. My dispatcher figured the fuel load to the nth degree and it is a beautiful fuel column, literally a work of art.
Stay with me here... I promise to keep it short and simple.
The weather at KLAS is marginal, so we have fuel for an alternate 30 minutes away, three turns in holding, and the legally required 45 minute reserve. The fuel planning has to be exact, with no room to wiggle, except, maybe, the holding fuel. Yes, we can burn into the reserve, but that is another area altogether requiring a paperwork exercise that can be unpleasant.
In case of a delayed approach and landing, a few turns in holding allows both pilots to mentally re-group, recalculate fuel to the alternate, and send a Fi-Fi message to Mother. Sometimes it takes two turns before talking to dispatch... A dispatcher will typically handle 20 to 40 flights. If six of them are holding at the same fix you are... Well, you can see the problem.
Under normal circumstances, the captain and dispatcher need to confer about the best course of action. I have had a few occasions when I did not have the fuel to wait, so I made the decision and told dispatch later... The captain must be very careful doing this course of action, though. How strong is that tree limb?
Back to ppos (present position)...
High-altitude sunlight is flooding my side of the flightdeck with warm, white light. I have raised the gold colored cellophane sun shields to cover most of the Plexiglas on the left side. Recent warnings about the effects of high-altitude solar radiation on flight crews have convinced me to carry sun block in my flight bag; I am not sure if it helps, but I apply it to my left arm and face, anyway.
What I am about to do next is almost unforgivable... Descend to thicker air and burn more fuel.
ATC clears us to 30,000 feet and I set a vertical speed of 1500 feet per minute in the auto-pilot... Down we go as the fuel burn goes up. This will not take too long as we are not that much overweight. When the fuel load is correct, confirmed by the flight plan check points, we will climb back to cruise altitude.
Over Peaches (PGS- Peach Springs)...
Through the approach gate for Lost Wages at 25,000 feet and 300 knots indicated. We are still about 300 pounds too heavy... This fits into the category of measuring with a micrometer and cutting with an axe. No one knows the exact weight of the aircraft; it can be several thousand pounds either side of the final weight from Mother. However, there must be hard limitations to which we strictly adhere.
Prino intersection...
Crossing Prino at 8,000 feet and 210 knots indicated... Time to throw the landing gear out and burn some more fuel. The big gear doors open into the slip stream and the mains and nose lock in position. That will do it...
Runway 25 Left... The Stopping Program...
Touchdown at maximum landing weight and, allegedly, not one pound over. Reverse thrust triggers are pulled up and over opening the cascade vanes for maximum reverse thrust. The spoilers on top of the wings rise to maximum extension destroying the lift. The Electric Jet transfers her weight to the landing gear and after three seconds begins to apply brakes via the braking computers. Lord, I do love this aircraft!
Clearing both parallel runways, we raise flaps, stow spoilers, turn off lights and call operations with a, "We're here!" We can see day-glo orange vests scrambling for our arrival at the gate.
We have 42 minutes to turn this baby for KLAX. More than enough time... Heck, that is enough for a crew frappuccino run to Starbucks; captain is buying, of course.
Life on the Line continues...
27 comments:
The best aviation blog in the industry, bar none...
Cap'n Dave:
Re: "measuring with a micrometer and cutting with an axe"
Oh, yes. Never mistake precision for accuracy. They's two different things.
Regards,
Frank
Great post as usual Dave. Just saw a clip on the news about an Airbus diverting to Seattle from ANC due to an engine failure.. Hope that wasn't you. Love the blog!
ATC makes your customers VERY happy, but cause you extra workload. Gate to wheels up in 10 min is good for any passenger!. It certainly wasn't going to hurt your on-time departure and arrival percentage.
Nice of you to get them to the slots a few minutes sooner, you even gave the ground crew a few extra minutes to turn FiFi. They both think you're a great pilot and they're both right!
Just remember, excess fuel is one of the least common goodies in aviation:
Bad things in aviation:
Fuel in the exhaust
Empty coffee urns
Looking up for altitude
Reading license plates @ 180KIAS
Navigating by exit numbers
Thanks for taking us along on another trip, Cap'n - I was starting to miss my fix of Life at the Pointy End!
May I ask why you only fly domestic routes? Is it just a matter of seniority or do you prefer the skies of home?
Thanks again for taking the time to write this blog. It's a treat to read!
Hello (C)aptain Dave,
I'm just back from searching for a good-quality Line paint which I was going to ferry over to your airline so they could get you back up there....
Now, however (...just in the nick of Time) I can let go of this chore because I see someone else must've done the job for me.
If you could even *guess* at the number of times I went in yesterday to find you, you'd weep!
Gave up and took to my bed in despair at around 21.30 last night!
The Wait notwithstanding, yet another blog that leaves me in no doubt that whatever salary you earn, it's surely too little ?
But on the upside, I guess you've regained (at least) a glimmer of the redeeming authority curve, which has me feeling considerably happier!
Keep 'em coming Captain Dave.
Three more in the next 15 days....
Just kidding !
And as always, thank you again !
I love the love you have for your FiFi !
Warmly,
Bev
From a wondrous morning in Cape Town
Dave:
If you wanted, couldn't you just add power and cruise faster rather than descend? This would have burned off the excess fuel correct??
Landing gear down and locked at 8000 feet - that would have caused a cocked eyebrow among your more frequent pax... love that the Electric Jet has "braking computers" - did not know that...
Excellent technical post - loved the details!
Interesting. My fuel burn doesn't change that much with altitude, so if I am over landing weight I run a little rich and go sightseeing for a bit.
Thank you Captain, the worries a commander carries may be somewhat alleviated by experience in most walks of life, but fast moving kinetic mass with souls on board are a different matter. You make it seem routine to work the four dimensional puzzle of position, speed, and weight preparing to kiss the earth safely while under the timetable tyranny. And then to write it up so elegantly and share it with so many is to be doubly talented.
Just curious, when the crew stays overnight in Vegas, do you usually stay at a casino hotel or an off-strip property? Does staying in Vegas ever cause problems for a flight crew?
Only curious because I live in Vegas.
david- thanks...
Frank Van Haste- absolutely correct...
Ryan- nope, wasn't I... In fact I have not heard about that.
Desk Pilot- if you are on fire, maybe excess fuel is bad...
BH06- Mostly domestic, yes... My aircraft flys North America and the Carribean. Different aircraft have different routes. To answer your question, it is mostly a matter of seniority, i.e., I can hold better lines on Fi-Fi for my seniority.
Bev- thanks for worrying about the frequency of posts. I will try harder...
Michael- yes, in theory you could do that, but flying at the barber pole is not very far from Mach .79 normal cruise, so the fuel burn does not increase that much. Increasing from a .76 cruise to .81 would be a big difference.
Ravee- I am sure...
Aviatrix- roger the sight seeing... I wish we could do that. I'll bet the pax would like it...
buach-fast moving kinetic mass with souls onboard; excellent description of what I do... Thanks
Dan- we stay at casinos and off-strip hotels, depending on the length of overnight. Does it cause problems? Yep, it does... We have had a lot of interesting, uh, events happen in Vegas. Unfortunately for the crews involved, what happens in Vegas does not stay in Vegas.
I've enjoyed reading this post several times already. I hadn't realized how dramatically a few thousand feet would affect drag. It makes sense though. Very interesting post ... as always! Happy flying Captain. I also love that you love your airplane. ~DeAnn
Excellent post Captain Dave. While your planning was spot on, it reminds me of an error made many years ago by an unfortunate marketing exec who contracted my old employer to do charters from Mykonos in the Greek islands to Dublin one summer in 737 400s. The marketing guy didn't get his sums right when it came to runway length, end of runway mountain height, 30 degree centigrade nighttime temperature and the many tons of fuel required for the 4 and half hour flight.
An over eager despatcher loaded fuel without making a final check with our captain. We were simply too heavy to take off with a full load of passengers at that temperature with that mountain in front of us. There being no defueling capabaility we had to take half the passengers only as far as Athens with gear down and flaps out (which felt like driving over cobblestones) to be light enough to take off and land. We had to return to Mykonos for the other half of the passengers, touch down again in Athens, refuel, reload the first half of the passengers and then on to Dublin.
Dave, I have read about high alt. UV/solar radiation exposure ie above FL300 etc especially pertinent for long haul carriers (some "older" Commanders note sun spots/skin cancer on their left arm/face after yrs of flying) Doesn't the plexiglass windscreen in modern acft. block UVA/B rays (to some effective degree) to not "worry" about sunscreen. Thanks for your thoughts.
Excess Fuel...
Reminds me of a time when we were part of the "bomber stream" of charter flights between the UK and the popular Spanish holiday islands of Majorca, Ibiza and Menorca. It was nighttime, we were on our way outbound at maybe FL350 or so (can't remember) and heard one of our company aircraft northbound over France at a very fuel-inefficient FL260. We were wondering what he was doing down there when the easily recognisable voice of out Chief Training Captain called him across to the company frequency on box 2. As usual in this situation, everybody else listens in on the conversation to hear the outcome.
(names changed to protect the innocent, Doug)
CTC - "Hi Pete, what are you doing down there?"
"Pete" - "About 349 knots!"
349kt is 1 knot short of the Vmo of 350kt. They had had a snag with the refuelling panel at Palma and it hadn't shut off at the required amount and as a result they were VERY heavy on fuel and would have been overweight for landing if they hadn't blasted up France at high speed (and thus high fuel flows) at the inefficient lower levels. If they had waited for a defuel they might still be there waiting...
Fantastic post as usual Cap'n Dave!
Excellent post Captain Dave! I've heard from many pilots the importance of a proficient and exact dispatcher and how it makes their lives so much easier! You seem to have a few gems where you are!
I am curious. When you hear that a plane has to dump fuel. I imagine that fuel is just released into the air. What is the process? Thanks. Awesome blog as usual.
Shaun
Into LAS from the east? Too bad you couldn't do a hold over the Grand Canyon. That would be worth the fuel.
Good article here: http://www.rd.com/home-garden/50-secrets-your-pilot-wont-tell-you/article186583.html -- I like what it says about seat belts, and about John Wayne (Orange County) airport and the rocket take-offs.
Is that the Captain's foot I see there in the photo? What an interesting photographic angle!
Thank you for another spellbinding insight in your world.
Dave, we used to be able to land overweight if we had to return after TO due to some problem and the Captain deemed it as safe as dumping fuel or holding for a long time. Which I have done after shutting down an engine--way over weight. This has been so long ago though that I can't remember why we were allowed to land way over weight with a problem but couldn't be a little over when every thing worked. I too have burned off fuel to get down to landing weight so I operated under the same constraint. I just can't recall the rationale. Can you explain?
What does NON-GPS mean on the instrument panel? Not equipped with GPS, or not approved for GPS procedures, or what?
I only fly in simulation, but I fly over the same virtual territory that you fly over in real life. It's very cool to be able to read about how it is in the real world.
david- well, thanks...
Aprenta- that means it is an older airframe built before GPS was common in airliners. So, we can't do RNAV or GPS overlay approaches in this particular aircraft.
John the Pilot- we can land overweight but there had better be a good reason for doing so... The rate of descent needs to be low and a lot of runway remaining. It is a logbook write-up and an event report, etc. There is very little maintenance action required other than an inspection at certain weights. Yeah, I know what you mean... The logic is fuzzy.
Noella- you are correct! That is the captain's foot. Fi-Fi has folding stirrups under the panel. They are good for stretching legs on long flights.
Shaun- that is about it. Fuel is released into the atmosphere to reduce weight. It is an EPA nightmare scenario for the company, though.
C130driver- I always assumed the Plexiglas cut most UV, but the company put out a caution about direct sunlight on exposed skin at high altitude. They did not specify an altitude...
"The runway lights are falling away as Fi-Fi's gorgeous legs unlock and pull up into her belly, followed by landing gear doors click-clacking shut. At 1,000 feet above the ground, thrust levers back to climb power and watch the fuel flows roll back out of five digits, barely, into the upper four digit range."
How can enyone who loves airplanes can be indiferent to this kind of writting, thank you again for showing your world to all off us!!!
Captain, another great post! Just curious, was that A320 High Land Weight or Basic? Most of our A320's have High Land Weight (66T).. you appreciate that 1.5T extra..
oh sorry about the Tons, we do work with Kg's in my company...
Keep'em Coming'!
Daniel, From SCEL
It is funny how I can relate to your posts, even though I am only a simmer.
Couple days ago I did a PRG/DUB flight for CSA virtual. The nice thing about CSA, they are pretty much into As Real As It Gets, which, among other things (we use real CSA SOPs, for ex.), means a really nice dispatch web. Nothing like a real dispatcher you have, but quite a tool for PC Simming. Thing is, it cant quite progress any winds over 60kts either way.
So there I am, fully ladden 737-400 on charter, some odd 800 navy miles awaiting me, looks good so far. Lets have a look at the weat...her. 100kts HW pretty much all the way, what now. Dispatch brief has me with 11.3t of fuel, 1.3t under MZFW, planned LW about a tonne shy of the limit. Planned for 60kts on the nose.
SOPs have me able to add up to 2 tonnes of uh-oh fuel, so there we go, fill er up so we just dont bust MTOW.
Of course, Dublin coming close, instead of expected arrival fuel of 3.8, or maximum allowed 4.8, I am sitting there with predicted 6.8. Should go down still. Well, Germany past me, showing 6.6. Uh-oh time. I did try to speed up to barber pole, but that only helped me with some .5t, I was already over ECON crz fl, funny it never dawned on me to descend.
Anyway, I ended up holding on arrival. And the report system still busted me by 30 kilos... that I could not have seen on the loadsheet. Measure with micrometer, cut with axe, then measure again.
btw, the leg was originally to be flown by stretch Fi-Fi, but those are on short supply for flight simulators... if just one decent showed up. You made me like the type.
Post a Comment