Virtual Position: MMMX (Mexico City), runway 05 Left
Actual Position: Pilot school house, simulator #11
Equipment: A320E (enhanced, sort of like version 6.0)
Density Altitude: 7,000 feet
Gross Weight: Max allowed
It is that time of year, again...
The sim instructor, whom I have known for years, is really proud of his new $48,000,000 toy. He keeps saying, "Dave, you're really gonna love this... Just tell me when you are ready."
I hate it when a sim instructor says that...
Gee, I wonder what is going to happen next? The visibility has magically reduced to only a couple of white runway stripes ahead and the aircraft is at max gross weight at a high altitude airport with high terrain in three of the four quadrants. Probably an engine failure.
I have flown with my co-pilot a few times out on the Line, but never in the simulator. He is a young, single, intelligent, George Clooney looking guy who spends a great deal of time on Facebook via his smart phone. He was Facebooking tonight in the simulator until the instructor told him to turn that [deleted] cell-phone off.
To me, that is unreal. Playing digital footsie with flight attendants would have been the last thing on my mind when I was a co-pilot in the simulator. I would have been worried about performing well enough to pass the simulator ride. Apparently, he is a heck of a lot smarter than I was at his age, or we really are living in the New Age of kinder and gentler training.
A few seconds later and we are rolling down the MMMX runway with AC/DC's Thunderstruck playing on my mental iPod, the almost perfect engine failure tune.
When I first checked out on the Electric Jet, training showed us a video of a suave and debonair French test pilot demonstrating engine failures in an actual aircraft. His co-pilot would pull an engine to idle thrust at lift-off speed and the test pilot would quickly and precisely accomplish all engine failure procedures without changing heading a single degree, displacing the yaw indicator one iota, or causing a single ripple in his coffee; all the while giving a running commentary about his aircraft.
The video was a thing of beauty... A jaw dropping demonstration of absolute mastery of an aircraft.
Admittedly, he made his living demonstrating Fi-Fi to potential customers. But still... You have to be a multi-engine pilot to really understand it. Just thinking about it makes me all misty- eyed.
Seeing that at the beginning of Fi-Fi training all those years ago has always given me a target to shoot for in simulator training, i.e., smooth and stable engine failure drills worthy of that French test pilot. Will I ever get there? Not going to happen, but 75% might be obtainable.
A few knots before the 150 knot rotation speed, I am ready to apply rudder to counteract the loss of thrust on one side, and then crank (actually, it is an electric switch) a lot of rudder trim into the mix while maintaining runway heading and a positive rate of climb.
When the co-pilot calls out "rotate", I ease the nose off the runway waiting for the tell-tale clues, via the rudder pedals, of which engine is going south. Unfortunately, no engine fails and I am caught unprepared for a normal take-off. I can hear the sim instructor quietly snickering behind me. My take-off is sloppy... I was prepared for trouble, but nothing happened. Fi-Fi responds to my nervousness by wallowing a bit, patiently waiting for the human pilot to make up his feeble mind. I respond by pulling the nose up to eighteen degrees and calling for landing gear UP.
Of course, as soon as the nose is eighteen degrees above the horizon, number two engine catches on fire. Jet engines are always burning inside, and on rare occasions, outside, too.
Actually, simulator engines seem to burn on the outside a lot...
The co-pilot calls out "Engine Fire!" The engine is still producing thrust, so instead of doing the fire drill, I will let the fiery engine's thrust help carry us to a safe altitude. No need to get in a hurry and make a stupid mistake; after all, there is no propeller to feather.
At 1,500 feet above the ground, it is time to do the fire drill:
1. Engine two thrust lever pulled back to the idle stop
2. Engine two fuel cut-off to OFF
3. Engine two FIRE button pushed (kills the hyds, fuel, electrics, bleeds, etc)
4. Engine two fire extinguisher discharged
Now, a thirty second count begins to see if the fire actually goes out. If not, there is one more fire extinguisher bottle for a second chance. In less than ten seconds, the fire is out.
The Electric Jet flies (fairly) well on one engine, as she is doing now. Her nav computers recognize that an engine has failed and has presented us with the published escape route, which is back to the VOR in a left turn and enter holding. I trim the rudder to help with the engine out condition and then turn the auto-pilot ON.
The co-pilot takes over as flying pilot and I begin the multiple checklists, read-and-do items, to get this wounded bird back on the ground. Naturally, the weather below us it at landing minimums, adding another vector to the simulator drill... Still a busy night ahead of us. And so it goes... Year after year.
Life on the Line continues... Virtually.
41 comments:
Another good one Captain.. Getting ready for my visit to the schoolhouse in April. Keep the shiny side up!
Even my NON-Aircraft loving wife got a chuckle out of your post!
"Jet engines are always burning inside, and on rare occasions, outside, too.
Actually, simulator engines seem to burn on the outside a lot..."
You have a kind, yet potent way with words, Sir!
But still... You have to be a multi-engine pilot to really understand it. Just thinking about it makes me all misty- eyed.
I am not, but I do.
Saw a fork-life driver in the marines, hossing around a tactical fork-lift. Driving up a steep hill, carrying an open-top box to the six-bys waiting a the top. Drove into a trench.
I held my breath: all of my shop's computer equipment was in there.
And back then out of the trench, just that quick. Kept the box level the entire time, jockeying the forks up/down/side-to-side.
Guy knew his tools, that's for sure.
I wish the co-pilot at the controls of the UA 747 I was on back in 1998, SFO-SYD, had spent a bit more time in the simulator practicing this stuff.
When an engine failed as we departed SFO, loaded down for the long flight across the Pacific, he completely botched the recovery, almost stalled the plane, and just missed going in at the top of San Bruno Mountain, which sits off the end of the runway there. I read afterward we missed it by about 100 feet.
More practice is always better.
48mil? WOW! At one point I had a goal to find a real sim that is available for public. When I did find one (somewhere in Canada), I realized that the cost to "rent" one hour is equivalent to 12 hours of flying a cessna. I would agree with many that real flying, whether it's Cessna or PiperCub, can't be beat with the feeling of a simulator, but I think it would be an amazing experience to "fly" a virtual A320. ehhh...One day!
Great post, as usual! Safe flying!
Very interesting post - those sneaky sim instructors :)
One question - does the instructor play the role of ATC?
Thanks for your great post Captain Dave!
Do you check non-flying related things on your iPhone during flight, or is it highly forbidden by the company?
And if you are on a 10-hour flight, i suppose you are not 100% focussed on the computers all the time. So what do you do during such flights?
Thanks for writing this great blog,
Kind regards,
a wannabee pilot
Hi Captain Dave
It was your NY's resolution to work on increasing your blogs per month.
Mine was to stop badgering you for more blogs (per month) !
You're doing swell !
How'm I doing ?
Not sure why but I'm struggling to get comments thru of late.
Not sure what I'm doing that I shouldn't be doing.....or what I'm not doing that I should be doing....
Anyway, here's trying again....
Safe flying and always - I hope - enough fuel to do an essential detour....
Sincerely,
Bev
From a somewhat overcast Cape Town.
Temp 26 deg - humidity 57%.
Local time 1:35 pm
It's HOT !
Love it! A friend of mine at a large European airline did a stint running the sims there - he let me fly the B747 after hours one day. Even though only a low time PPL holder, he gave me the works, 2 engine failures and a fire. I managed to get it back on the (simulated) ground at YYZ, but missed the runway. Hopefully, some of the pax survived......
... almost perfect ... hmmm,with the utmost respect and admiration I will submit:
AC/DC
Back in Black (1980)
You Shook Me All Night Long
Perhaps you are saving that for a real flight though.
~D
Hello Captain Dave
Again an interesting post. Some years ago I happened to see instructional videos for the electric jet. What struck me most was that f.i. an engine failure almost seemed a non-event for the crew. Hardly imaginable but seriously cool.
best regards
Frank /.netherlands
shaw- yep, the airline did a good job of keeping that one quiet. I read one estimate of 500 killed on the ground if you had hit that terrain.
DeAnn- I considered Back in Black... One of favorite treadmill tunes.
Chris- yes, and the flight attendants sometimes...
Bev- OK, I'll try harder... Really.
Well, at least the sim instructor had you on the 05 departure, out over the flats and lake bed. Going out on 23, well, your attention has to be on the buttons and knobs, but if the view out the window on the simulator includes all that spiky stuff sticking out of the ground it could be a bit distracting, not to mention the consequences of spreading burning jet fuel over one of the most densely populated places on the planet.
Another great post, Dave. Thanks. Those periodic SIM sessions may be a pain, but their value is well known and is part of the job. Great job, BTW! So, who are those sneaky Sim Instructors? I'm guessing high-hour captains who have aged-out of line flying, but I don;t know that for sure. Agreeing with Bev, more posts would be fine.
-Craig
Dave,
I'm intrigued by your comment regarding the FO having his cell phone out in the sim. I fly at a rather 'uptight' airline in the fragrant harbor. I used to fly for a US regional. There is such a stark contrast between the two worlds it is amazing. I think the US mentality that we will train to proficiency is a good philosophy but people are getting lazy. If I had a cell out in the box at my carrier, I'd be meeting with the training manager. I think what your FO did in the sim, was disrespectful to not only you, but the profession. There is a time and place but even if you are a super pilot, the sim and training events in general should be treated with a bit more seriousness. Keep it up.
That was a great read. I really enjoy your topics involving the sim and all the 'fun' you have in there!
Jonathan - YEG
Apparently, he is a heck of a lot smarter than I was at his age, or we really are living in the New Age of kinder and gentler training.
I really hope its the former (no offense Capt. Dave!), because if its the latter, I won't be flying any more once your battle-hardend generation of real pilots leaves the line.
Thanks as always for another engaging and intriguing post. Be well!
Just as a point of clarity for any non AC/DC fans ... Hard to believe, but possible ... "You Shook Me Up All Night Long" is on the Back in Black album along with the title song. I promise to punctuate better on future comments! ... Thought it went well with a long night at the sim!
... Enjoyed the post as always, Captain.
~DeAnn
Any chance that you may have published a book? Any chance you would consider writing a book? If you were to link the post to EAA AOPA (if they would let you), you would develop an even larger following. I have read many (many) books on aviation from Stick and Rudder to A Wing and a Prayer (Harry Crosby), and I would buy and read your book if one were written... just sayin'....
Surely you are going to way overweight for landing...particularly for a single engine landing?
Captain Dave,
Yet another great post sir! Reading it brought back the memories of my hour in the fi-fi "box" a few years ago (thanks to an airline that shall remain nameless). Fi-fi trully is an amazing aircraft. Nothing beats an engine failure while on short final on an approach in CatII minimums :-).
Any advice for a new student pilot?
Thanks and keep up the great writting.
Captain Dave,
Yet another great post sir! Reading it brought back the memories of my hour in the fi-fi "box" a few years ago (thanks to an airline that shall remain nameless). Fi-fi trully is an amazing aircraft. Nothing beats an engine failure while on short final on an approach in CatII minimums :-).
Any advice for a new student pilot?
Thanks and keep up the great writting.
Hey ! Read *slowly* now Captain Dave....
Re the number of your blogs so far this year, I said that you were doing SWELL !!
Amazing quality and *quantity* of blogs from you.
THANK you.
My point was that I had resolved to *stop* badgering you (for more blogs).
Really bin workin' at it.....every bit as hard as you work on your cursing threshold !
ttfn,
Bev
Stomp the good engine - How to successfully recover your aircraft from an engine failure on takeoff.
(just a random thought of a book idea)
Great blog! Your last name isn't Osborne is it?!?
Chris
Historically, some accidents were caused by poor cooperation / CRM on the flight deck.
In the sim, do they ever inject a situation (using a briefed FO, for example), have them do a Foxtrot Uniform, and then see how the crew cooperates and reacts?
Or are all the events precipitated by the situation and the technology?
Super cool story, as always (smile!).
John Boyd on the heros list. What a terrific choice.
One of the true heros and patriots. I implore all who read Capt. Dave's blog to learn more of this complex inspiring man. Start with Coram's "John Boyd The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War". Copying another famous author. "Its Not About The Plane".
Learning and continuing to read about John Boyd has changed my life. Amazing. Good call, Capt. Dave.
I laughed out loud! "Spring loaded for disaster" is how we are in the sim... A "normal" take off just isn't in the game plan! My sim partner once aborted thinking we had an engine out... The instructor had dialed in more crosswind than he was expecting. All was well, and there we were, stopped in the middle of the virtual runway, with a perfectly functioning virtual airplane, looking up times for cooling of virtual brakes.
As always, a fun read. Here's hoping my next 'Hot, High and Heavy' session goes as well!
Cheers,
Aaron
Capt Dave,
Always hated the old sims...The A/C would inevitably fail at the least opportune time...by the time you crawled out of there, you were not fit for to be with man nor beast. Another great post...Im sitting here in the desert watching contrails coming out of San Diego wondering if one might be you. Tail winds to ya.
J.- if the sim instructor had been one of the anal retentive types, the FO would have been meeting with the training manager...
Jim- thanks; probably not going to write anything but this poor little blog until I retire. No time...
Jim- yes, quite a bit actually. Good crm in the sim will cover a multitude of sins...
Larry Jones- probably was me up there...
Flying - the description inadequate - seems to resemble the observation of war Captain Dave - was it 95% boredom interspersed with 5% terror. Piloting an aircraft on ones own is pretty challenging but with loads of human beings in tow every flight so much more so. Successful school house returns must be reassuring to a line pilot that if or when the dreaded circumstances present themselves you are as ready as you can be. Great Scott!
While I'm thinking about it, I wanted to ask you this completely unrelated to your latest fantastically verbose blog question.
My thought is this. As you know, either the landing gear is gonna come down or it isn't. So, why does the FAA require airliners to put the gear down so far away from the airport? And B, how much fuel would it save per year if you could let the landing gear down similar or just before the point at which the space shuttle puts its gear down?
Speaking of Smartphones, I use the "Fire left engine...Fire, right engine" from the MD-80 as my ring tone on my Blackberry when my son calls :)
"C"aptain Dave: I'm posting this here, as I don't know if you go back to see posts from previous subjects ie: AF447 Part 3
====================================
"C"aptain Dave:
Back in your original posts about the horrible tragedy of AF#447, I mentioned that I thought that AirFrance, AirBus and the French Gov't MIGHT collude to hide the facts of this accident, given the incredible LIABILITY of them all being "in bed" together.
Someone immediately "informed" me that European Courts were not "LIKE AMERCIAN COURTS" IE: "Lawsuit-happy."
Well, it looks like the tides have changed, and both Air France and Airbus are facing charges for manslaughter.
It REALLY makes one wonder what they have uncovered, that they have not made public YET. And if they EVER will.
I've never seen a carrier or aircraft company charged like this, with no explanation, evidence, or conclusion/ruling of the cause of the crash. Don't the need to know what caused the crash, before they can deduce who is liable for what?
I also read that The BOEING Company, of all people, is playing a huge role in the next attempt to find the CVR & CDR Black Boxes.
What say you about the charges leveled against both companies?
I'd LOVE to hear your thoughts... Is it a witch hunt, a blame game, a cover up, a gov't attempt to 'charge them first, before they can charge/sue us, a set of legitimate charges, or something else...???
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/18/air-france-faces-manslaug_n_837449.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1367509/Airbus-faces-manslaughter-charges-Air-France-crash-killed-228.html
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/europe/france/110318/air-france-atlantic-airbus-air-crash-brazil-rio-a330
Without discounting the importance of your own personal privacy, R&R, and space... of which I respect.
You do realize that 3 WEEKS without a story is killing us out here, right?
See Dave, your fans NEED you!
Your time and efforts really are worthwhile and appreciated by so many. Please never underestimate the value of your much-loved FL390.
P.S. Also respecting your private life and time!
Noella ;-)
Repeat after me, Dave.
"Dear father, I am sorry for all my sins, it has been 23 days since my last post."
Just joking, but this must be a new record!
Eagerly awaiting your next post, no doubt that the reason for your absence is that you are working on a mega-post, the likes of which have never been seen before.....right?
As you can see, loving the blog.
Keep it up!
Well, when Captain Dave is away he always has a good reason.
Maybe while he is away we readers can post links to our favorite Captain Dave FL 390 posts of all time. This might be mine ...
http://flightlevel390.blogspot.com/2010/04/mornings-earliest-light.html
Ja.....
My New Year's resolution was to NOT put pressure on our "C"aptain to keep the blog momentum (= energy?) going.
I've slipped once.
Mea culpa !
I vow I won't slip again...
Shant...
Shant...
Shant !
The worst scenario arising from this silence would be that he has retired without telling us...
Okay, so you aren't writing Captain Dave - then I hope you're at least taking in the wonders of the Arizona desert on your JDM (...instead of sorting out the plumbing!).
Kindly
Bev - Cape Town
I too must confess I'm addicted to FL390. This is the first page I check in the morning--before the NY Times, before the weather, before my email. I can't explain the addiction in rational terms. I'm not remotely involved in aviation professionally or even as a hobby, but this blog is absolutely fascinating.
Good to hear someone flying virtually out of my former home base, do u guys fly a lot to MMMX or was the sim instructor being mean with engine failures at 7341 ft? Like warlocketx said, you got the good part by going out from 05L, the return to SLM from the 23s is a little more involved O_o Kepp on writing, it really is good for the soul of those who still have to look on from the other side of the cockpit door =)
Post a Comment